Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the highly anticipated and long-awaited Smite Hunter Tierlist for Season 10. As a Smite expert, I will provide a detailed analysis of each hunter character, their strengths, weaknesses, and their placement on the tierlist. With the recent changes and updates in Season 10, it is important for players to understand the current status of each character to make informed choices in gameplay.

Blue Stone vs. Power Pen Hunters

To begin, let’s discuss the two types of hunters in Smite: ability type hunters and auto attack type hunters. Each type has its own unique build and playstyle. Ability hunters prioritize power and penetration, while auto attack hunters focus on attack speed and crit.

  1. Ability Type Hunters: Examples of ability hunters include AMC, who benefits from the buff to Crusher in Season 10, resulting in increased damage output. However, these hunters are susceptible to ganks and lack defense. Nevertheless, a fully built AMC can still one-shot assassins.

  2. Auto Attack Type Hunters: On the other hand, auto attack hunters like Anhur and Apollo have more versatile kits but lack the same power as ability hunters. Anhur suffers from the inability to fit flat pen into the build, affecting his abilities, especially in the late game. Similarly, Apollo’s ultimate is a hindrance in the dual lane, costs a lot of mana, and leaves him vulnerable to assassins.

Hunter Placement on the Tierlist

Now, let’s delve into the placement of each hunter character on the tierlist, based on their performance and viability in Season 10.

S Tier: Top Performers

  1. Chronos: As a mage ADC, Chronos excels in damage output and is ideal for power pen builds. His passive and scaling make him a force to be reckoned with in the late game, while also possessing fast jungle and wave clear abilities. His split push potential is also exceptional.

  2. Other Mage ADCs: These characters, including Cupid, offer utility but lack power in the early game. Cupid, in particular, struggles with low damage output and slow wave clear, placing him at the bottom of the tierlist.

A Tier: Strong Choices

  1. AMC: Despite the vulnerability to ganks, AMC’s power pen build allows for significant damage output. His ability to clear and bully the lane is noteworthy, making him a strong pick.

  2. Apollo: Although Apollo’s ultimate is a disadvantage, his early game kit is solid. However, he falls short compared to other hunters due to his lack of uniqueness and power.

B Tier: Average Performance

  1. Anhur: Anhur’s inability to incorporate flat pen into his build affects his abilities, especially in the late game. He remains an average pick in terms of overall performance.

  2. Chernobog: Chernobog possesses great potential but suffers in the early game due to struggles in clearing waves and lanes. However, his mid to late-game presence and ultimate playmaking potential place him above average on the tierlist.

C Tier: Weaker Choices

  1. Artemis: Artemis struggles significantly in the current meta due to her weak AOE clear capabilities. She is heavily countered by mage ADCs and high power-clear gods like Izanami, making it difficult for her to perform well.

  2. Other Hunters: Characters like on her, Apollo, and Cupid fall into this tier due to their lack of power, poor early game performance, and vulnerability to ganks and dominance from other hunters.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Smite Hunter Tierlist for Season 10 is based on the performance and viability of each character in the current meta. Ability type hunters, especially those with power pen builds, have the upper hand in terms of damage output. Auto attack hunters, while providing versatility, lack the same power. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each hunter is crucial for players to make informed decisions in gameplay.

It is important to note that this tierlist is not set in stone and may change as the meta evolves throughout Season 10. As a player, feel free to experiment with different builds and playstyles based on personal preference and team composition.